Thumb Drives With ThunderBolt Interface
ThunderBolt Keychain Flash DrivesTwo or so years back, Intel showed a prototype ThunderBolt flash drive brought out from the depths of their labs for a public viewing at an electronics show. And that was the last we saw of it. Will other storage manufacturers enter this category of PC and Mac backup device marketplace? Back in the USB 2.0 days before SuperSpeed USB 3.0 and 3.1 - we briefly saw FireWire 400/800 flash drives from OCZ and Kanguru that marginally outperformed their USB 2.0 counterparts in that era. The big issue is the $50-$75 price premium a ThunderBolt flash drive would entail. The extra cost of the ThunderBolt chipset and it's licensing requirements isn't cost-justifiable in the eyes of many consumers.
|Intel Thumb Drive Prototype||Smallest ThunderBolt Drive So Far|
|Tiny ThunderBolt SSD
Dimensions: 3" x 2.5" x .65"
ThunderBolt 3 Type-C USB-C Compatible Flash DrivesThe ThunderBolt thumb drive market that never really materialized is being made moot by the arrival of ThunderBolt 3 interface. Using the SAME Type-C connector as USB-C and with the ability to 'Tunnel' USB 3.1 protocols over the TBolt3 bus -- Consumers will be able to plug in a USB-C flash drive into a ThunderBolt3 port and never notice the difference. Even with USB 3.1's increased bandwith to 10Gbps, only the most high-end keychain type drive will begin to fill the 10Gbps USN 3.1 Gen2 pipeline anyways. Expect to simply see alot of marketing billing USB 3.1 Type-C flash drives as 'ThunderBolt 3 COMPATIBLE' although they'll be functional using USB protocols.
|Fast USB 3.1 Thumb Drive||Cheap USB 3.1 Thumb Drive|
|Samsung USB-C Flash Drive
64GB - 128GB 150MBps Speed
|SanDisk Ultra USB-C Flash Drive
16GB - 128GB Capacitiess
USB3 vs ThunderBolt Flash Drive Speeds and CostsPerhaps some of the reasons for the delay in ThunderBolt flash memory drives reaching the market is the Price / Performance benefits (and more accurately, the lack thereof.) It would take some serious price reductions in the cost of licensing ThunderBolt chipsets to justify much of a market for ThunderBolt keychain style drives.
As we've seen in the desktop, portable and pocket-drive SSD markets, 5Gbps SuperSpeed USB 3.0 bandwidth can pretty much handle the maximum data transfer rates of the most current and fastest USB3 thumb drives quite easily. So there's little point in paying more for a ThunderBolt keychain drive to achieve near identical performance over cheaper USB 3 products.
With the top performing USB 3.0 flash drives from companies like SanDisk and Patriot currently maxxing out with peak Read / Write speeds slightly over 250MB/s, the NAND flash memory itself -- and not the computer interface is still the limitation. Substituting a significantly more expensive ThunderBolt chipset with direct access to the computer's PCIe bus for a USB 3.0 3.1 controller chip wouldn't make the flash memory any faster. At best you might see a trivial, minor increase in performance simply because (like FireWire 400/800) ThunderBolt is a more efficient protocol without some of the extra CPU utilization and overhead of negotiating a data transfer that the USB Universal Serial Bus device specification involves.
Even when the latest, state-of-the-art single 6GBps SATA III solid-state drives are connected to a ThunderBolt or USB 3.1 port they tend to utilize only about half of the available bandwith on either computer interface. Much of this is simply because most data transfers in every-day real-world use sparse, spotty and intermittent Read / Write requests. Most data requests are NOT SUSTAINED, BANDWITH INTENSIVE processes much of the time.
Tags: ThunderBolt Flash Drives, ThunderBolt Thumb Drive, Intel Flash Drive, ThunderBolt 3 Flash Drive, ThunderBolt 3 Keychain Drive, Type-C Flash Drive